Search found 32 matches
- Fri Sep 11, 2020 11:32 am
- Forum: Oberon Language
- Topic: Type compatibility rules summary.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 27370
Re: Type compatibility rules summary.
Hi, I think you're referring to a question I posted but then deleted because I discovered it had already been answered earlier on this forum. The summary you link to mixes up types and type identifiers, and defines "same type" for two variables but then uses the term "same type" in a context that do...
- Fri Sep 06, 2019 4:26 pm
- Forum: Oberon Language
- Topic: Another clarification about local names
- Replies: 3
- Views: 123732
Re: Another clarification about local names
I would have thought so but it contradicts the quoted statement.
- Thu Sep 05, 2019 9:41 pm
- Forum: Oberon Language
- Topic: Another clarification about local names
- Replies: 3
- Views: 123732
Another clarification about local names
Hi again, The language definition states: The use of the procedure identifier in a call within its declaration implies recursive activation of the procedure. That would seem to rule this out as legitimate code: PROCEDURE P; PROCEDURE P; END P; (*local*) BEGIN P (*which P does this refer to?*) END P;...
- Sun Sep 01, 2019 9:40 pm
- Forum: Oberon Language
- Topic: Looking for clarification: local procedures cannot call local procedures, right?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 42628
Re: Looking for clarification: local procedures cannot call local procedures, right?
Thanks for that. Yes, from the latest revision of the report: In addition to its formal parameters and locally declared objects, the objects declared globally are also visible in the procedure agrees with the quote you gave from PO2013, if the phrase "locally declared objects" means "objects declare...
- Sat Aug 31, 2019 2:05 pm
- Forum: Oberon Language
- Topic: Looking for clarification: local procedures cannot call local procedures, right?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 42628
Re: Looking for clarification: local procedures cannot call local procedures, right?
Ok, thanks for that. An interesting discussion. I need to get on that list!
- Fri Aug 30, 2019 2:12 am
- Forum: Oberon Language
- Topic: Looking for clarification: local procedures cannot call local procedures, right?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 42628
Looking for clarification: local procedures cannot call local procedures, right?
Hi, The following code: PROCEDURE P; PROCEDURE Q; (*local*) ... END Q; PROCEDURE R; (*local*) BEGIN ... Q ... END R; END P; is disallowed by the definition of Oberon07, that is, local procedure R cannot call local procedure Q, since the identifier Q is not local to R and not global....
- Mon May 02, 2016 6:45 pm
- Forum: Oberon Language
- Topic: Oberon Report Update 2016-05-01
- Replies: 33
- Views: 254906
Re: Oberon Report Update 2016-05-01
Can an open array be the target of an assignment? From the Report: "The type of the expression must be the same as that of the designator" and "Strings can be assigned to any array of characters..." Here's a question: if an open array is assigned to an array of equal base type but shorter length, i...
- Sun May 01, 2016 6:48 pm
- Forum: Oberon Language
- Topic: Oberon Report Update 2016-05-01
- Replies: 33
- Views: 254906
Re: Oberon Report Update 2016-05-01
Why? INTEGER is a qualident.(I assume that qualident still cannot be a basic type.)
- Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:27 pm
- Forum: Oberon Language
- Topic: Oberon Report update
- Replies: 3
- Views: 43091
Oberon Report update
The Oberon report has been updated. <= and >= no longer apply to SET arguments AFAICS. (See section 8.2.4)
- Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:48 pm
- Forum: Oberon Language
- Topic: Nested procedures
- Replies: 23
- Views: 156554
Re: Nested procedures
Hmm. I think the report should say:Langugae report is now much clear
In addition to its formal parameters and locally declared objects, the objects declared globally are also visible in the procedure (except objects whose identifiers coincide with those of locally declared objects).