Astrobe Forum

Latest changes and updates: https://oberon-rtk.org/updates/2025/cn-2025-04-11

Website: https://oberon-rtk.org/
GitHub repository: https://github.com/ygrayne/oberon-rtk

Latest changes and updates: https://oberon-rtk.org/updates/2025/cn-2025-03-30/ No framework changes are ready to commit, but an overhauled website, which should allow both a better overview, as well as easier access to the details: https://oberon-rtk.org/ GitHub repository: https://github.com/ygrayn...

Latest changes and updates: https://oberon-rtk.org/updates/2025/cn-2025-03-11/

Website: https://oberon-rtk.org/
GitHub repository: https://github.com/ygrayne/oberon-rtk

Latest changes and updates: https://oberon-rtk.org/updates/2025/cn-2025-03-06/

Main focus: basis to get the Astrobe tools running on macOS.

Website: https://oberon-rtk.org/
GitHub repository: https://github.com/ygrayne/oberon-rtk

I'd be interested in this, even in its current state without polish, guardrails, and packaging as a published Package Control-managed/delivered package. Would you be willing to send it to me? Hi dnm, sure, send me your e-mail address to gray@grayraven.org. I am in the midst of getting things workin...

Latest changes and updates: https://oberon-rtk.org/changes/2025/cn-2025-02-16/

Website: https://oberon-rtk.org/
GitHub repository: https://github.com/ygrayne/oberon-rtk

Well, I think you are underplaying your role and work here! I mean, if I look at the (version) history… :)

Is the original source code NW's ARM compiler available, as it is for Project Oberon?

J. Yiu states for both the M0+ (RP2040) and M33 (RP2350) that the program counter (PC) is the address of the current instruction plus 4 [1][2]. The Astrobe docs say that the RP2040's PC is four bytes ahead of the current instruction, while the RP2350 is eight bytes ahead. The Arm v8-M manual says th...

Thanks for the clarification. And this strictly works with BOOLEAN CONSTs only, correct? With this facility, we could now structure modules thusly. MODULE Variant; CONST RP2040* = TRUE; RP2350* = FALSE; END Variant. MODULE M; IMPORT Variant; PROCEDURE Init*; BEGIN IF Variant.RP2040 THEN (* ... *) EL...

Thank you for your explanations and example code. Nested IFs are only ever eliminated if the IF statement that contains them is eliminated. Hence, to be sure I understand this correctly, using your example code: CONST T0 = TRUE; F1 = FALSE; PROCEDURE P4(); BEGIN IF T0 THEN IF F1 THEN Included() (* ?...